4.7 Article

Investigation of resistance mechanisms to bentazone in multiple resistant Amaranthus retroflexus populations

Journal

PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105164

Keywords

Redroot amaranth; Bentazone; psbA gene; Resistance mechanisms; Metabolic resistance; Gene expression

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871985]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redroot amaranth is a noxious weed affecting soybean production in China. Two populations of this weed showed resistance to bentazone, and the resistance was found to be associated with increased expression of the psbA gene and enhanced herbicide metabolism.
Redroot amaranth (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) is a noxious weed that affects soybean production in China. Experiments were conducted to determine the molecular basis of resistance to bentazone. Whole-plant dose -response experiments showed that two populations (R1 and R2) exhibited resistance to bentazone with resistance indices of 9.01 and 6.85, respectively. Sequencing of the psbA gene revealed no amino acid substitution in the two populations. qRT-PCR analysis verified that psbA gene expression in R1 and R2 populations was increased significantly after treatment with bentazone, which was 3-fold and 5-fold higher than that in S1 and S2 populations, respectively. The P450 inhibitor malathion significantly reduced the level of resistance in the R1 and R2 populations when used prior to bentazone treatment. The R1 population exhibited multiple resistance to thifensulfuron-methyl and lactofen, caused by target site mutations (Asp-376-Glu in ALS, Arg-128-Gly in PPO2). In conclusion, increased gene expression of the psbA gene and enhanced herbicide metabolism seem to be the basis of resistance to bentazone in these A. retroflexus populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available