4.5 Article

Nature vs. Nurture: Feature vs. Structure for Graph Neural Networks

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 46-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2022.04.036

Keywords

graph neural networks; transferability

Funding

  1. ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE200101465]
  2. Australian Research Council [DE200101465] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a hypothesis is proposed regarding the connection between features and structure in graph neural networks, suggesting that graphs can be constructed by connecting node features according to a latent function. This hypothesis has several important implications, including defining graph families, applying GNNs on featureless graphs, and predicting the existence of a latent function that can create graphs outperforming original ones for specific tasks. A graph generative model is proposed to learn such function, and experiments confirm the hypothesis and implications.
Graph neural networks take node features and graph structure as input to build representations for nodes and graphs. While there are a lot of focus on GNN models, understanding the impact of node features and graph structure to GNN performance has received less attention. In this paper, we propose an explanation for the connection between features and structure: graphs can be constructed by connecting node features according to a latent function. While this hypothesis seems trivial, it has several important implications. First, it allows us to define graph families which we use to explain the transferability of GNN models. Second, it enables application of GNNs for featureless graphs by reconstructing node features from graph structure. Third, it predicts the existence of a latent function which can create graphs that when used with original features in a GNN outperform original graphs for a specific task. We propose a graph generative model to learn such function. Finally, our experiments confirm the hypothesis and these implications. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available