4.7 Article

Super U-Net: A modularized generalizable architecture

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108669

Keywords

Image segmentation; U-Net; Dynamic receptive field; Fusion upsampling

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01CA237277]
  2. UPMC Hillman Develop-mental Pilot Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed and validated a novel convolutional neural network called Super U-Net for medical image segmentation. The Super U-Net integrates dynamic receptive field module and fusion upsampling module to improve image segmentation performance.
Objective: To develop and validate a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) termed Super U-Net for medical image segmentation. Methods: Super U-Net integrates a dynamic receptive field module and a fusion upsampling module into the classical U-Net architecture. The model was developed and tested to segment retinal vessels, gastrointestinal (GI) polyps, skin lesions on several image types (i.e., fundus images, endoscopic images, dermoscopic images). We also trained and tested the traditional U-Net architecture, seven U-Net variants, and two non-U-Net segmentation architectures. K-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate performance. The performance metrics included Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and sensitivity. Results: Super U-Net achieved average DSCs of 0.808 +/- 0.0210, 0.752 +/- 0.019, 0.804 +/- 0.239, and 0.877 +/- 0.135 for segmenting retinal vessels, pediatric retinal vessels, GI polyps, and skin lesions, respectively. The Super U-net consistently outperformed U-Net, seven U-Net variants, and two non-U-Net segmentation architectures (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dynamic receptive fields and fusion upsampling can significantly improve image segmentation performance. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available