Global prevalence of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of gingival recession (GR) in the general population. Materials and Methods Population-based observational studies reporting the prevalence of GR and published from 1991 to 2021 were identified from five electronic databases and manual searches. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Studies. The pooled prevalence of GR was calculated by using a random-effect model. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to summarize the overall certainty of evidence. Results A total of 15 studies involving 37,460 participants were included. The overall pooled prevalence was 78.16% at the minimal reported threshold values and 84.92% at >= 1 mm cut-off with high heterogeneity among studies. A separate analysis for the buccal GR revealed a pooled prevalence of 75.42%. The risk of bias was found to be high for 10 and low for 5 studies. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed to be very low. Conclusion More than two-thirds of the population worldwide was found to be affected by GR. Studies with standard case definition and less heterogeneity are required to accurately estimate the prevalence of GR.

Automated summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of gingival recession (GR) in the general population. A total of 15 studies involving 37,460 participants were included. The overall pooled prevalence was found to be 78.16% at the minimal reported threshold values. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed to be very low. More standardized studies with less heterogeneity are needed to accurately estimate the prevalence of GR.