4.6 Article

Contrast mechanisms in pump-probe microscopy of melanin

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 30, Issue 18, Pages 31852-31862

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.469506

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-2108623]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [450198538]
  3. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative [2021-242921]
  4. National Institutes of Health [K08 CA237726-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pump-probe microscopy is proposed to improve the diagnosis of malignant melanoma by analyzing the signals of melanin. The study decomposes the signals and identifies the molecular mechanisms most susceptible to melanin disaggregation, creating false-colored images to highlight these processes in biological tissue. The results demonstrate a correlation between false-colored images of melanoma tumors and clinical concern, and the approach can be applied to other samples.
Pump-probe microscopy of melanin in tumors has been proposed to improve diagnosis of malignant melanoma, based on the hypothesis that aggressive cancers disaggregate melanin structure. However, measured signals of melanin are complex superpositions of multiple nonlinear processes, which makes interpretation challenging. Polarization control during measurement and data fitting are used to decompose signals of melanin into their underlying molecular mechanisms. We then identify the molecular mechanisms that are most susceptible to melanin disaggregation and derive false-coloring schemes to highlight these processes in biological tissue. We demonstrate that false-colored images of a small set of melanoma tumors correlate with clinical concern. More generally, our systematic approach of decomposing pump-probe signals can be applied to a multitude of different samples. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available