4.4 Article

Short-term tear film stability, optical quality and visual performance in two dual-focus contact lenses for myopia control with different optical designs

Journal

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1062-1073

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/opo.13024

Keywords

light disturbance; multifocal contact lens; myopia control; tear film stability; visual performance; visual quality

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UID/FIS/04650/2013, PTDC/FIS-OPT/0677/2014, PTDC/SAU-BEB/098391/2008]
  2. Universitat de Valencia
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/FIS-OPT/0677/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed and compared the short-term visual and optical quality and tear film stability of two dual-focus prototype myopia control contact lenses with different inner zone diameters. The results showed that both lenses provided acceptable visual performance under photopic conditions. The lens with a 4.0 mm inner zone diameter had better contrast sensitivity at high frequencies and lower light disturbance.
Purpose To assess and compare short-term visual and optical quality and tear film stability between two dual-focus (DF) prototype myopia control contact lenses (CLs) having different inner zone diameters. Methods Twenty-eight myopic subjects were included in this randomised, double-masked crossover study. Refraction, best-corrected visual acuity (VA) and tear film stability were measured at baseline (i.e., when uncorrected). Subjects were then binocularly fitted with the DF CLs, with only the sensorial dominant eye being assessed. Lenses were of the same material and had inner zone diameters of either 2.1 mm (S design) or 4.0 mm (M design). Visual and physical short-term lens comfort, over-refraction, best-corrected VA, stereopsis at 40 cm, best-corrected photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS), size and shape of light disturbance (LD), wavefront aberrations, subjective quality of vision (QoV Questionnaire) and tear film stability were measured for each lens. Results Both CL designs decreased tear film stability compared with baseline (p < 0.05). VA and photopic CS were within normal values for the subjects' age with each CL. When comparing lenses, the M design promoted better photopic CS for the 18 cycles per degree spatial frequency (p < 0.001) and better LD (p < 0.02). However, higher-order aberrations were improved with the S design (p = 0.02). No significant difference between the two CLs was found for QoV scores and tear film stability. Conclusions Both DF CLs provided acceptable visual performance under photopic conditions. The 4.0 mm inner zone gave better contrast sensitivity at high frequencies and lower light disturbance, while the 2.1 mm central diameter induced fewer higher-order aberrations for a 5 mm pupil diameter. Both CLs produced the same subjective visual short-term lens comfort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available