4.7 Article

Patient Blood Type Is Associated With Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Metastatic Cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGIST
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages E739-E745

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac128

Keywords

blood type; immune checkpoint blockade; immune-related adverse events; time to treatment failure

Categories

Funding

  1. BristolMyers Squibb
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. Incyte
  4. AstraZeneca/MedImmune
  5. Merck
  6. Pfizer
  7. Roche/Genentech
  8. Xcovery
  9. Fate Therapeutics
  10. Genocea
  11. Iovance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the associations between immune-related adverse events, blood type, and time to treatment failure in patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade. The results suggest that patients with type O blood and those who experienced immune-related adverse events may have a better treatment outcome.
This article reports a series of patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint blockade, focusing on associations between immune-related adverse events, blood type, and time to treatment failure. Background Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has transformed cancer therapy, with long-term responses and a favorable safety profile; however, only a minority of patients respond. Response to ICB is influenced by immune-related genetic factors such as HLA haplotype, potentially including patient blood type and associated differences in diversity of the T-cell repertoire. A minority of patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with unclear relation to response or resistance. Materials and Methods In this single institution study, we aimed to investigate the relationship of time to treatment failure (TTF) with patient blood type and with occurrence of irAEs, among patients with metastatic cancer receiving ICB. Results We found a strong association of improved TTF with presence of irAEs, and also among patients with type O blood, compared with type A/B/AB blood. Among patients with type O blood, TTF was substantially longer among those experiencing an irAE (n = 44; adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18,0.96). For patients with type A/B/AB blood, no significant association was present (n = 63; adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39,1.21). For type O patients, median TTF of ICB was 13.4 months (95% CI: 3.79 months, NA) vs 2.55 months (95% CI: 1.95 months, 4.95 months) for other patients. Conclusion This retrospective study of a cohort of patients receiving ICB suggests a preferential benefit among patients with type O blood and, in particular, among patients with type O blood who developed irAEs. Validation in future independent cohorts and investigation of a potential biologic basis for this finding is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available