4.4 Article

Investigations of nanofluid flow and heat transfer in a rotating microchannel using single- and two-phase approaches

Journal

NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART A-APPLICATIONS
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 80-115

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2022.2083886

Keywords

Brownian motion; Euler-lagrange model; nanofluid; rotating U-type microchannel; slip flow; two-phase models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the effects of different models on laminar forced convection heat transfer and fluid flow of Al2O3/water nanofluid in a rotating U-shaped microchannel. The results show that increasing the volume fraction and rotational speed can enhance the slip velocity and heat transfer. The Eulerian-Eulerian model and Euler-Lagrange model provide higher total Nusselt numbers compared to the single-phase model. The maximum heat transfer enhancements are achieved by increasing the rotational speed from zero to 600 at a volume fraction of 5%.
The impacts of single- (SPM) and two-phase models (TPMs), including Euler-Lagrange (ELM) and Eulerian-Eulerian models (EEM), on a laminar forced convection heat transfer and fluid flow of the Al2O3/water nanofluid are evaluated in a rotating U-shape microchannel with a square cross-section and constant wall temperature. The effects of Reynolds numbers, rotational speed, volume fraction, Brownian motion, and implementation of no-slip and slip conditions are investigated. The slip velocity and heat transfer increase by increasing the volume fraction and rotational speed. The EEM and ELM provide a higher total Nusselt number than the SPM. The maximum heat transfer augmentations of 53.3%, 45.7%, and 41% are achieved for the EEM, ELM, and SPM by increasing the rotational speed from zero to 600 at phi = 5%. The predictions of pressure drop by TPMs are essentially the same but considerably lower than SPM. Unlike the ELM, the nanoparticle concentrations of EEM and SPM are uniform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available