4.1 Article

Accuracy, Precision, and Optimal Sampling Duration of Low-Frequency Electrofishing for Sampling Reservoir Flathead Catfish Populations

Journal

NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1269-1284

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10819

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Resource Ecology and Management Department at Oklahoma State University
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch project) [1023034]
  3. Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources at Oklahoma State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, accuracy, precision, and optimal sampling duration for low-frequency electrofishing (LFE) sampling of Flathead Catfish were evaluated. The capture probability of Flathead Catfish was found to be correlated with fish length and water temperature. Different lakes showed variations in catch rates and size bias, but size bias within each lake was relatively consistent at different temperatures. The highest and most consistent catch rates were observed from June to September when water temperatures were above 24 degrees C. The minimum number of 5-minute LFE efforts needed to achieve a relative standard error below 25% was found when water temperature was above 20 degrees C from May to September.
Flathead Catfish Pylodictis olivaris are popular among anglers; however, information about their sampling is limited. Low-frequency electrofishing (LFE) is the most used method for sampling Flathead Catfish, but LFE data quality (precision and accuracy) has not been previously studied. Therefore, we evaluated accuracy, precision, and optimal sampling duration for maximizing precision of LFE sampling for Flathead Catfish. To quantify accuracy, we created known populations by tagging Flathead Catfish in Lake Carl Blackwell, Lake McMurtry, and Boomer Lake, Oklahoma, with numbered modified Carlin dangler tags and calculated their capture probabilities from recapture data with a Cormack-Jolly-Seber model, with water temperature as an environmental covariate and fish size as an individual covariate. Capture probability was negatively correlated with increases in fish length for Lake Carl Blackwell and Lake McMurtry but was positively correlated with increases in fish length for Boomer Lake. Capture probability was highest at warmer temperatures at Lake Carl Blackwell and Lake McMurtry but was highest at lower water temperatures at Boomer Lake. Therefore, catch rate and size bias varied by system, but size bias was still relatively consistent at all temperatures within lakes (i.e., lake-specific differences in slopes were subtle even though significantly different), indicating that LFE could be used to detect relative changes in size structure if temperatures were standardized. Catch rates were highest and most consistent from June to September when water temperatures were >= 24 degrees C. The number of 5-min LFE efforts needed to achieve a relative standard error <= 25% was lowest when water temperature was >= 20 degrees C from months between May and September. Catch rates and size structure did not differ between LFE efforts (5, 10, or 15 min), suggesting that any LFE effort would produce similar relative abundance estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available