4.2 Article

Cadmium leaching from some New Zealand cropping soils

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2022.2105902

Keywords

Phosphorus fertiliser; mass balance models; accumulation; drainage; fluxmeter

Funding

  1. Fertiliser Association of New Zealand Incorporated [A26211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used passive-wick fluxmeters to measure cadmium in drainage at different agricultural sites. The results showed that most sites had cadmium concentrations below the detection limit, with only occasional detections from two sites and no detections from three sites. However, one site had higher cadmium concentrations and the measured loss was similar to the modelled estimate. Further research is needed to validate modelled data against measured data.
Mass balance modelling often shows that leaching is the main loss pathway for cadmium (Cd) from agricultural soils. There is however a scarcity of Cd leaching data measured under field conditions to support these modelled losses. This study used passive-wick fluxmeters installed at a depth of one metre at six commercial cropping sites to measure Cd in drainage over one year of monitoring. Cadmium concentrations were generally below the method detection limit (0.05 mu g Cd L-1) for all sites, with only the occasional detection from two sites and no detection from three other sites. The exception was site A where average Cd concentrations ranged from 0.06 to 0.18 mu g L-1 and the mean annual loss (+/- SE) was 0.33 +/- 0.08 g Cd ha(-1). This was similar to the amount estimated using the drainage flux multiplied by a modelled estimate of soil solution Cd concentrations for the site, 0.41 g Cd ha(-1). Cadmium balance models typically assess the rate of Cd accumulation in the 0-7.5 or 0-30 cm soil depth. Further studies are still required to obtain Cd leaching data collected under field conditions at these soil depths to allow modelled Cd leaching to be validated against measured data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available