4.7 Article

Curcumin liposomes prepared with milk fat globule membrane phospholipids and soybean lecithin

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 1780-1790

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10391

Keywords

curcumin; liposome; milk fat globule membrane; phospholipid; soybean lecithin

Funding

  1. National Natural Foundation of China [31171631, 31571773]
  2. Guangdong Province Science and Technology Plan Project [2011B031200005]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Ocean and Fishery Science and Technology [A201301C04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using thin film ultrasonic dispersion method, the curcumin liposomes were prepared with milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) phospholipids and soybean lecithins, respectively, to compare the characteristics and stability of the 2 curcumin liposomes. The processing parameters of curcumin liposomes were investigated to evaluate their effects on the encapsulation efficiency. Curcumin liposomes were characterized in terms of size distribution, zeta-potential, and in vitro release behavior, and then their storage stability under various conditions was evaluated. The curcumin liposomes prepared with MFGM phospholipids had an encapsulation efficiency of about 74%, an average particle size of 212.3 nm, and a zeta-potential of 48.60 mV. The MFGM liposomes showed higher encapsulation efficiency, smaller particle size, higher absolute value of zeta-potential, and slower in vitro release than soybean liposomes. The retention rate of liposomal curcumin was significantly higher than that of free curcumin. The stability of the 2 liposomes under different pH was almost the same, but MFGM liposomes displayed a slightly higher stability than soybean liposomes under the conditions of Fe3+, light, temperature, oxygen, and relative humidity. In conclusion, MFGM phospholipids have potential advantages in the manufacture of curcumin liposomes used in food systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available