4.8 Editorial Material

It's Hardly Credible - Medical Readers and Literary Plague

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 386, Issue 24, Pages 2257-2259

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2119103

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reading Camus' The Plague, a physician finds it hard to believe why the protagonist does not prescribe sulfa drugs. She questions whether it is the questionable prescribing of a fictional character or the reader's too-literal interpretation that may amount to literary malpractice.
It's Hardly Credible Reading Camus' The Plague, a physician wonders why the hero doesn't prescribe sulfa drugs. If there's such a thing as literary malpractice, she asks, is it the questionable prescribing of a fictional character or the heavy-footed perseverations of a too-literal reader?

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available