4.7 Review

Brain stimulation and other biological non-pharmacological interventions in mental disorders: An umbrella review

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104743

Keywords

Biological non-pharmacological treatments; Deep brain stimulation; DBS; Electro-convulsive therapy; ECT; Light therapy; Mental health; Meta-analysis; Transcranial direct current stimulation; TDCS; Umbrella review; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; TMS; Vagus nerve stimulation; VNS

Funding

  1. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS)
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ)
  3. Program of Academic Productivity (PIPA) of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School
  4. Sao Paulo Research Foundation
  5. Janssen
  6. Lundbeck
  7. Otzuka
  8. Angelini
  9. Pfizer
  10. National Institute of Aging (NIA)
  11. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  12. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  13. Takeda
  14. [PQ -1B]
  15. [2018/10861-7]
  16. [2019/06009-6]
  17. [CM21/00033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological non-pharmacological treatments are effective and safe for various mental disorders, although the certainty is limited. The results provide guidance for future research and guidelines.
Background: The degree of efficacy, safety, quality, and certainty of meta-analytic evidence of biological non-pharmacological treatments in mental disorders is unclear. Methods: We conducted an umbrella review (PubMed/Cochrane Library/PsycINFO-04-Jul-2021, PROSPERO/CRD42020158827) for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on deep brain stimulation (DBS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), electro-convulsive therapy (ECT), and others. Co-primary outcomes were standardized mean differences (SMD) of disease-specific symptoms, and acceptability (for all-cause discontinuation). Evidence was assessed with AMSTAR/AMSTAR-Content/GRADE. Results: We selected 102 meta-analyses. Effective interventions compared to sham were in depressive disorders: ECT (SMD=0.91/GRADE=moderate), TMS (SMD=0.51/GRADE=moderate), tDCS (SMD=0.46/GRADE=low), DBS (SMD=0.42/GRADE=very low), light therapy (SMD=0.41/GRADE=low); schizophrenia: ECT (SMD=0.88/GRADE=moderate), tDCS (SMD=0.45/GRADE=very low), TMS (prefrontal theta-burst, SMD=0.58/GRA-DE=low; left-temporoparietal, SMD=0.42/GRADE=low); substance use disorder: TMS (high frequency-dorsolateral-prefrontal-deep (SMD=1.16/GRADE=moderate), high frequency-left dorsolateral-prefrontal (SMD=0.77/GRADE=very low); OCD: DBS (SMD=0.89/GRADE=moderate), TMS (SMD=0.64/GRADE=very low); PTSD: TMS (SMD=0.46/GRADE=moderate); generalized anxiety disorder: TMS (SMD=0.68/GRA-DE=low); ADHD: tDCS (SMD=0.23/GRADE=moderate); autism: tDCS (SMD=0.97/GRADE=very low). No sig-nificant differences for acceptability emerged. Median AMSTAR/AMSTAR-Content was 8/2 (suggesting high -quality meta-analyses/low-quality RCTs), GRADE low. Discussion: Despite limited certainty, biological non-pharmacological interventions are effective and safe for numerous mental conditions. Results inform future research, and guidelines. Funding: None.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available