4.7 Review

The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 608-620

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41579-022-00767-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review introduces a model of bacterial biofilm formation and points out that the current five-step model fails to capture many aspects of biofilm physiology. The authors propose a more inclusive model that can accommodate various scenarios of biofilm formation.
Bacterial biofilms are often defined as communities of surface-attached bacteria and are typically depicted with a classic mushroom-shaped structure characteristic of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, it has become evident that this is not how all biofilms develop, especially in vivo, in clinical and industrial settings, and in the environment, where biofilms often are observed as non-surface-attached aggregates. In this Review, we describe the origin of the current five-step biofilm development model and why it fails to capture many aspects of bacterial biofilm physiology. We aim to present a simplistic developmental model for biofilm formation that is flexible enough to include all the diverse scenarios and microenvironments where biofilms are formed. With this new expanded, inclusive model, we hereby introduce a common platform for developing an understanding of biofilms and anti-biofilm strategies that can be tailored to the microenvironment under investigation. In this Review, Bjarnsholt and colleagues propose a revised conceptual model of the biofilm life cycle that encompasses the three major steps of biofilm formation - aggregation, growth and disaggregation - independently of surfaces, and initiation from single-cell planktonic bacteria, and thus represents a broader range of biofilm systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available