4.8 Review

Insights on catalytic mechanism of CeO2 as multiple nanozymes

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 10328-10342

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4666-y

Keywords

heterogeneous catalysis; ceria; nanozyme; oxygen vacancy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872109, 52002314]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633504, 2018M633749]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [D5000210829, D5000210601, G2021KY05102]
  4. Funds Shaanxi Province [2021JM-589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CeO2 nanozymes with tailorable surface physicochemical properties exhibit diverse catalytic behaviors under different conditions, showing potential for disease diagnosis and treatments.
CeO2 with the reversible Ce3+/Ce4+ redox pair exhibits multiple enzyme-like catalytic performance, which has been recognized as a promising nanozyme with potentials for disease diagnosis and treatments. Tailorable surface physicochemical properties of various CeO2 catalysts with controllable sizes, morphologies, and surface states enable a rich surface chemistry for their interactions with various molecules and species, thus delivering a wide variety of catalytic behaviors under different conditions. Despite the significant progress made in developing CeO2-based nanozymes and their explorations for practical applications, their catalytic activity and specificity are still uncompetitive to their counterparts of natural enzymes under physiological environments. With the attempt to provide the insights on the rational design of highly performed CeO2 nanozymes, this review focuses on the recent explorations on the catalytic mechanisms of CeO2 with multiple enzyme-like performance. Given the detailed discussion and proposed perspectives, we hope this review can raise more interest and stimulate more efforts on this multi-disciplinary field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available