4.8 Article

Programmable Bispecific Nano-immunoengager That Captures T Cells and Reprograms Tumor Microenvironment

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages 6866-6876

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00582

Keywords

nano-immuno-engager; fibrillar transformation; T cells capture; immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA115483, U01CA198880, R01CA247683, R01EB012569, R01CA232845, R01DE029237]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFE0205400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a programmable tumor cells/T-eff cells bispecific nano-immunoengager that can enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy by improving T cell infiltration and modulating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has revolutionized clinical oncology. However, the efficacy of ICB therapy is limited by the ineffective infiltration of T effector (T-eff) cells to tumors and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we report a programmable tumor cells/T-eff cells bispecific nano-immunoengager (NIE) that can circumvent these limitations to improve ICB therapy. The peptidic nanoparticles (NIE-NPs) bind tumor cell surface alpha(3)beta(1) integrin and undergo in situ transformation into nanofibrillar network nanofibers (NIE-NFs). The prolonged retained nanofibrillar network at the TME captures T-eff cells via the activatable alpha(4)beta(1) integrin ligand and allows sustained release of resiquimod for immunomodulation. This bispecific NIE eliminates syngeneic 4T1 breast cancer and Lewis lung cancer models in mice, when given together with anti-PD-1 antibody. The in vivo structural transformation-based supramolecular bispecific NIE represents an innovative class of programmable receptor-mediated targeted immunotherapeutics to greatly enhance ICB therapy against cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available