4.6 Article

Age-dependent rise in IFN-γ competence undermines effective type 2 responses to nematode infection

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1270-1282

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41385-022-00519-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [GRK2046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that spontaneous differentiation and expansion of Th1 cells with age restricts type 2 immune responses to intestinal nematode infections. Blocking early IFN-gamma and IL-12 signals decreases Th2/1 differentiation and enhances resistance.
The efficient induction of type 2 immune responses is central to the control of helminth infections. Previous studies demonstrated that strong Th1 responses driven by intracellular pathogens as well as a bias for type 1 activity in senescent mice impedes the generation of Th2 responses and the control of intestinal nematode infections. Here, we show that the spontaneous differentiation of Th1 cells and their expansion with age restrains type 2 immunity to infection with the small intestinal nematode H. polygyrus much earlier in life than previously anticipated. This includes the more extensive induction of IFN-gamma competent, nematode-specific Th2/1 hybrid cells in BALB/c mice older than three months compared to younger animals. In C57BL/6 mice, Th1 cells accumulate more rapidly at steady state, translating to elevated Th2/1 differentiation and poor control of parasite fitness in primary infections experienced at a young age. Blocking of early IFN-gamma and IL-12 signals during the first week of nematode infection leads to sharply decreased Th2/1 differentiation and promotes resistance in both mouse lines. Together, these data suggest that IFN-gamma competent, type 1 like effector cells spontaneously accumulating in the vertebrate host progressively curtail the effectiveness of anti-nematode type 2 responses with rising host age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available