Journal
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 518, Issue 1, Pages 585-591Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1978
Keywords
methods: data analysis; (cosmology:) cosmological parameters; (cosmology:) distance scale
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, we aimed to rederive the 8 Hubble parameter values obtained from estimated relative galaxy ages by Simon et al. We found that to achieve the claimed precision level in H(z), unrealistically small galaxy age uncertainties must be assumed, and some parameter values will be correlated. Our analysis showed that the uncertainties in the Hubble parameter values are significantly larger when 8 independent H(z) are obtained using Monte Carlo sampling. Smaller uncertainties can be obtained using Gaussian processes, but the results are strongly correlated. We did not obtain any useful constraints on the Hubble parameter from the galaxy data employed.
We set out to rederive the 8 Hubble parameter values obtained from estimated relative galaxy ages by Simon et al. We find that to obtain the level of precision claimed in H(z), unrealistically small galaxy age uncertainties have to be assumed. Also, some parameter values will be correlated. In our analysis we find that the uncertainties in the Hubble parameter values are significantly larger when 8 independent H(z) are obtained using Monte Carlo sampling. Smaller uncertainties can be obtained using Gaussian processes, but at the cost of strongly correlated results. We do not obtain any useful constraints on the Hubble parameter from the galaxy data employed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available