4.7 Article

Arp 58 and Arp 68: two M 51-type systems

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 516, Issue 1, Pages 656-667

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2165

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: abundances; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: spiral; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation (RSCF) [19-72-20089, 19-12-00281]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2022-262 (13.MNPMU.21.0003)]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [KR4598/2-1]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  6. Center for HighPerformance Computing at the University of Utah
  7. Brazilian Participation Group
  8. Carnegie Institution for Science
  9. Carnegie Mellon University
  10. Chilean Participation Group
  11. French Participation Group
  12. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  13. Instituto de Astrof'isica de Canarias
  14. Johns Hopkins University
  15. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  16. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  17. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  18. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  19. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  20. Max-PlanckInstitut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  21. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  22. New Mexico State University
  23. New York University
  24. University of Notre Dame
  25. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  26. Ohio State University
  27. Pennsylvania State University
  28. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  29. United Kingdom Participation Group
  30. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  31. University of Arizona
  32. University of Colorado Boulder
  33. University of Oxford
  34. University of Portsmouth
  35. University of Utah
  36. University of Virginia
  37. University of Washington
  38. University of Wisconsin
  39. Vanderbilt University
  40. Yale University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares two M 51-type systems, Arp 68 and Arp 58, and finds significant differences in their stellar masses, gas content, and environment. The study reveals large-scale non-circular gas motion in both systems and saw-edged velocity profiles along the tidal spiral arm of Arp 68. The main galaxy in the Arp 68 system is experiencing a burst of star formation, while Arp 58 has a higher metal abundance and a shallow negative radial gradient of the gas-phase oxygen abundance.
We study two M 51-type systems Arp 68 and Arp 58, which strongly differ by their stellar masses, gas content, and environment. Long-slit spectral observations obtained at the Russian 6-m telescope were used to trace the distributions of a line-of-sight (LOS) velocity and a gas-phase oxygen abundance along the spectral cuts. Two systems are compared by their observed properties. We found a very strong large-scale non-circular motion of gas in both systems and a kpc-size saw-edged velocity profile along the tidal spiral arm of Arp 68, probably caused by the gas outflow due to the stellar feedback. A deep decrease of LOS velocity is also found in the 'hinge' region in Arp 58, where the inner spiral arm transforms into the tidal spiral arm, which was predicted earlier for M 51-type galaxies. Local sites of star formation and the satellites are compared with the evolutionary models at the colour-colour diagrams. Unlike the spiral galaxy Arp 58, the main galaxy in Arp 68 system is experiencing an ongoing burst of star formation. Gas-phase metallicity estimates show that Arp 58 has a higher metal abundance and reveals a shallow negative radial gradient of the gas-phase oxygen abundance. The emission gas in Arp 68 has noticeably lower metallicity than it is expected for a given luminosity of this galaxy, which may be connected with its space position in the local void.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available