4.6 Article

Naphthalene vs. Benzene as a Transmitting Moiety: Towards the More Sensitive Trifluoromethylated Molecular Probes for the Substituent Effects

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27134173

Keywords

naphthalene; substituent effect; density functional theory (DFT); substituent effect stabilization energy (SESE); trifluoromethyl group

Funding

  1. Adam Mickiewicz University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of mono- and poly(CF3)substituted naphthalene derivatives on the electronic properties of these compounds using the DFT computational method. The findings demonstrate that the poly(CF3)substituted derivatives of naphthalene are the most sensitive molecular probes for studying substituent effects in the aromatic system.
The application of DFT computational method (B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)) to mono- and poly(CF3)substituted naphthalene derivatives helps to study changes in the electronic properties of these compounds under the influence of 11 substituents (-Br, -CF3, -CH3, -CHO, -Cl, -CN, -F, -NH2, -NMe2, -NO2, and -OH) to confront substituent effects in naphthalene with an analogous situation in benzene. This paper shows the dependencies of theoretically calculated SESE (Substituent Effect Stabilization Energy) values on empirically determined, well-defined Hammett-type constants (sigma(p), sigma(m), R, and F). Described poly(CF3)substituted derivatives of naphthalene are, so far, the most sensitive molecular probes for the substituent effects in the aromatic system. The presence of the trifluoromethyl groups of such an expressive nature significantly increases the sensitivity of the SESE to changes caused by another substitution. Further, the more -CF3 groups are attached to the naphthalene ring, the more sensitive the probe is. Certain groups of probes show additivity of sensitivity: the obtained sensitivity relates to the sum of the sensitivities of the mono(CF3)substituted probes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available