4.6 Article

Kinetic Analysis of Methane Hydrate Formation with Butterfly Turbine Impellers

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27144388

Keywords

gas hydrates; hydrate formation; butterfly turbine; induction time

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [AP13068466]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research focuses on the heat generation during gas hydrate formation and presents a new impeller design to overcome this issue. The experiments show that using specific baffles and impeller types can enhance the rate of hydrate formation.
Heat generation during gas hydrate formation is an important problem because it reduces the amount of water and gas that become gas hydrates. In this research work, we present a new design of an impeller to be used for hydrate formation and to overcome this concern by following the hydrodynamic literature. CH4 hydrate formation experiments were performed in a 5.7 L continuously stirred tank reactor using a butterfly turbine (BT) impeller with no baffle (NB), full baffle (FB), half baffle (HB), and surface baffle (SB) under mixed flow conditions. Four experiments were conducted separately using single and dual impellers. In addition to the estimated induction time, the rate of hydrate formation, hydrate productivity and hydrate formation rate, constant for a maximum of 3 h, were calculated. The induction time was less for both single and dual-impeller experiments that used full baffle for less than 3 min and more than 1 h for all other experiments. In an experiment with a single impeller, a surface baffle yielded higher hydrate growth with a value of 42 x 10(-8) mol/s, while in an experiment with dual impellers, a half baffle generated higher hydrate growth with a value of 28.8 x 10(-8) mol/s. Both single and dual impellers achieved the highest values for the hydrate formation rates that were constant in the full-baffle experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available