4.5 Article

A Promiscuity Locus Confers Lotus burttii Nodulation with Rhizobia from Five Different Genera

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 1006-1017

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-06-22-0124-R

Keywords

genetic mapping; host range; Lotus; rhizobia; symbiotic; nitrogen fixation

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF79]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research reveals that Lotus burttii has a higher promiscuity in interactions with rhizobia compared to Lotus japonicus, allowing it to form nodules with rhizobia from five different genera. The mapping of the Gifu/burttii promiscuity quantitative trait locus (QTL) to the same genetic locus regardless of the rhizobial genus suggests a common genetic mechanism for symbiont-range expansion.
Legumes acquire access to atmospheric nitrogen through nitrogen fixation by rhizobia in root nodules. Rhizobia are soil-dwelling bacteria and there is a tremendous diversity of rhizobial species in different habitats. From the legume perspective, host range is a compromise between the ability to colonize new habitats, in which the preferred symbiotic partner may be absent, and guarding against infection by suboptimal nitrogen fixers. Here, we investigate natural variation in rhizobial host range across Lotus species. We find that Lotus burttii is considerably more promiscuous than Lotus japonicus, represented by the Gifu accession, in its interactions with rhizobia. This promiscuity allows Lotus burttii to form nodules with Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, and Allorhizobium species that represent five distinct genera. Using recombinant inbred lines, we have mapped the Gifu/burttii promiscuity quantitative trait loci (QTL) to the same genetic locus regardless of rhizobial genus, suggesting a general genetic mechanism for symbiont-range expansion. The Gifu/burttii QTL now provides an opportunity for genetic and mechanistic understanding of promiscuous legume-rhizobia interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available