4.5 Article

NTRK2 gene fusions are uncommon in pilocytic astrocytoma

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages 7567-7573

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07567-y

Keywords

Pilocytic astrocytoma; NTRK2; Tyrosine kinases; Gene fusions; FISH

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [CNPq-475358/2011-2]
  2. Sao Paulo Foundation for Research Support [FAPESP -2012/19590-0]
  3. CCSG Molecular Pathology/Cytogenetics [NIH-P30CA046934]
  4. Coordination for the Improvement of Level Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the frequency of NTRK2 alterations in Brazilian pilocytic astrocytomas. The results showed that NTRK2 alterations are rare genetic events in pilocytic astrocytomas, regardless of patients' clinicopathological and molecular features.
Background Pilocytic astrocytoma is the most frequent pediatric glioma. Despite its overall good prognosis, complete surgical resection is sometimes unfeasible, especially for patients with deep-seated tumors. For these patients, the identification of targetable genetic alterations such as NTRK fusions, raised as a new hope for therapy. The presence of gene fusions involving NTRK2 has been rarely reported in pilocytic astrocytoma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK2 alterations in a series of Brazilian pilocytic astrocytomas. Methods Sixty-nine pilocytic astrocytomas, previously characterized for BRAF and FGFR1 alterations were evaluated. The analysis of NTRK2 alterations was performed using a dual color break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. Results NTRK2 fusions were successfully evaluated by FISH in 62 of the 69 cases. Neither evidence of NTRK2 gene rearrangements nor NTRK2 copy number alterations were found. Conclusions NTRK2 alterations are uncommon genetic events in pilocytic astrocytomas, regardless of patients' clinicopathological and molecular features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available