4.5 Article

Calcification rates of a massive and a branching coral species were unrelated to diversity of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 9101-9106

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07702-9

Keywords

Porites australiensis; Acropora digitifera; Cladocopium; Polymorphism; Japan

Funding

  1. Nissei Science Foundation [02]
  2. KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18H03366, 18K18793, 19K22938, 20H00653]
  3. Research Laboratory on Environmentallyconscious Developments and Technologies (E-code) at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H00653, 19K22938, 18H03366, 18K18793] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the diversity of symbiotic algae in coral colonies with different calcification rates. The results suggest that coral calcification rates may be attributed to genetic factors of coral hosts themselves and/or within symbiont genotypes.
Background To explore the possibility that endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodiniaceae) are associated with coral calcification rates, we investigated the diversity of symbiotic algae in coral colonies with different calcification rates within massive and branching corals (Porites australiensis and Acropora digitifera). Methods and results Genotyping symbiotic algae from colonies with different calcification rates revealed that all the colonies of both species harbored mainly Cladocopium (previously clade C of Symbiodinium). The Cladocopium symbionts in P. australiensis were mainly composed of C15 and C15bn, and those in A. digitifera of C50a and C50c. We did not detect clear relationships between symbiont compositions and calcification rates within the two coral species. Conclusions Our results suggest that different coral calcification rates within species may be attributed to genetic factors of coral hosts themselves and/or within symbiont genotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available