4.4 Article

Use of an intraoperative veno-venous bypass during liver transplantation: an observational, single center, cohort study

Journal

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA
Volume 88, Issue 7-8, Pages 554-563

Publisher

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.15749-4

Keywords

Liver transplantation; Monitoring; intraoperative; Intraoperative care; Postoperative complications; Acute kidney injury; Hemodynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the use of a veno-venous bypass during liver transplantation did not alleviate the increased renal venous back-flow caused by inferior vena cava clamping, leading to renal congestion and reduced renal perfusion pressure.
BACKGROUND: As previous studies demonstrated conflicting results, we investigated the hemodynamic and renal outcomes of the intra-operative use of a veno-venous bypass during liver transplantation. METHODS: The intraoperative levels of mean artery pressure, cardiac index, inferior vena cava and renal perfusion pres-sures were compared in liver transplant patients receiving or not the bypass. RESULTS: We enrolled 38 patients: 20 with the bypass and 18 without. No differences characterized the two groups regarding gender (P=0.95), age (P=0.32), BMI (P=0.09), liver disease indicating LT and preoperative serum creatinine levels. Patients with the bypass received more intraoperative fluids (crystalloids and colloids) but with no difference in terms of intraoperative blood products and vasopressors requirements (P=0.33). After clamping of the inferior vena cava, patients with the bypass showed higher mean artery pressure. Simultaneously, pressure in the inferior vena cava below the clamp level sharply increased vs. baseline (P<0.0001) independently of the use of the bypass and remained high until clamp release. Consequently, renal perfusion pressure dropped abruptly (P<0.0001) after vena cava clamping and returned to baseline only upon clamp removal. Overall, 18 subjects developed postoperative acute kidney injury which was equally distributed between patients with (n=9) or without (N.=8) the bypass. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the use of a veno-venous bypass fails to release the increased renal venous back -flow from inferior vena cava clamping resulting in renal congestion with reduced renal perfusion pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available