4.7 Article

A new green method employing ultrasonic-assisted liquid-phase microextraction and digital imaging colorimetry for the determination of mefenamic acid in medicinal products

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107538

Keywords

Digital image colorimetry; Mefenamic acid; Liquid-phase microextraction; Drugs

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [311419/2018-6]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, fast, and low-cost method using ultrasonic assisted liquid-phase microextraction and digital imaging colorimetry was developed to determine mefenamic acid in drug samples. The method has a low detection limit and good precision, and follows the principles of green chemistry.
A simple, fast, and low-cost method was developed to determine mefenamic acid in drug samples. Ultrasonic assisted liquid-phase microextraction (UA-LPME) is applied to the preconcentration of mefenamic acid and subsequent detection by digital imaging colorimetry (DIC). The UA-LPME was performed with a eutectic solvent consisting of thymol and menthol (extraction solvent) and a solution of copper sulfate. Univariate optimization has been used to find the optimal working conditions. The variables studied were: copper sulfate concentration, eutectic solvent type, pH, sample volume, reaction time, and ultrasound time. The limit of detection obtained was 0.43 mu g mL(-1), and the precision (relative standard deviation) was 2.38%. The method was successfully applied to determine mefenamic acid in drug samples. The procedure follows the principles of green chemistry, as it uses small amounts of samples and reagents, generates few residues, and uses an environmentally friendly extraction solvent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available