4.5 Article

The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum: A comprehensive curricular evaluation

Journal

MEDICAL TEACHER
Volume 44, Issue 11, Pages 1268-1276

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2081142

Keywords

Evaluation; learning outcomes; methods

Funding

  1. Harvard Initiative for Teaching and Learning Cultivation Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum is a major reform effort aimed at enhancing reasoning and clinical skills, improving the learning environment, and changing students' approach to learning. Evaluation of the program showed that it outperformed or was equal to the previous curriculum in terms of learning environment and perceived quality of education, without compromising medical knowledge or clinical skills.
Purpose The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum represents a major reform effort. Our goals were to enhance reasoning and clinical skills and improve the learning environment and students' approach to learning via use of collaborative, case-based pedagogy; early clinical exposure; and enhanced approaches to teaching and evaluating clinical skills. We evaluated the impact of Pathways on key outcomes related to these goals. Materials and methods In this prospective, mixed-methods study, we compared the last prior-curriculum cohort (2014 matriculation, n = 135) and first new-curriculum cohort (2015 matriculation, n = 135). Measures included Likert-type surveys, focus groups, and test scores to assess outcomes. Results Compared with prior-curriculum students, new-curriculum students reported higher mean preclerkship learning environment ratings (Educational Climate Inventory, 62.4 versus 51.9, p < 0.0001) and greater satisfaction with the quality of their preclerkship education (88% versus 73%, p = 0.0007). Mean USMLE Step-1 and Step-2 scores did not differ between groups. At graduation, new-curriculum students rated their medical school experience higher in 6 of 7 domains, including 'fostering a culture of curiosity and inquiry' (4.3 versus 3.9, p = 0.006) and focus on 'student-centered learning' (3.9 versus 3.4, p = 0.002). Conclusions The new curriculum outperformed or was equal to the prior one on most measures of learning environment and perceived quality of education, without a decline in medical knowledge or clinical skills. Robust longitudinal evaluation provided important feedback for ongoing curriculum improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available