4.7 Article

A fault mechanism-based model for bearing fault diagnosis under non-stationary conditions without target condition samples

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111499

Keywords

Deep learning; Non-stationary working condition; Fault diagnosis; Fault mechanism; Rolling element bearing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fault diagnostic technique with high adaptability to industrial environments is crucial for engineering. This study proposes a novel model, called Fault Response Network (FRN), for diagnosing faults under variable conditions based on the bearing fault mechanism. By calculating fault features that remain unchanged with working conditions and designing a Fault Response Convolutional Layer (FRCL) based on these features, the FRN achieves high diagnostic accuracy even when there are significant changes in working conditions without samples from unknown conditions.
Fault diagnostic technique with high adaptability to industrial environments is important to engineering. Based on the assumption that samples from the training set obey the identical distribution as signals from the industrial equipment, deep learning-based methods achieved high diagnostic accuracy. However, the assumption is not always held in the industrial environment of non-stationary working conditions. Hence, a novel model named Fault Response Network (FRN) is proposed, which is based on the bearing fault mechanism for diagnosis under variable conditions. Firstly, we calculated the fault feature that does not change with working conditions. Secondly, Fault Response Convolutional Layer (FRCL) is proposed based on that feature. Finally, the FRN is constructed with FRCL and improved soft threshold function. Four diagnostic cases are used to verify the superiority of FRN. The FRN can obtain high diagnostic accuracy when working conditions change largely without samples from unknown conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available