4.7 Article

Deep learning based ground reaction force estimation for stair walking using kinematic data

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111344

Keywords

Ground reaction forces estimation; Deep learning; Kinematics; Stair walking

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61802338, 12002177]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [LQ19A020001]
  3. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, bilateral long short-term memory neural networks were trained to estimate ground reaction forces (GRFs) during stair ascent and descent using whole-body kinematics as input. A post-processing algorithm was developed to remove artifacts on GRFs in the swing phase. The models achieved excellent accuracy, allowing researchers to estimate 3D GRFs during stair walking without instrumented staircases.
Complete ground reaction forces (GRFs) are vital for biomechanical analysis. The GRFs are currently measured by force plates. The measurement of GRFs during stair walking is difficult due to the need for instrumented staircases. We trained two bi-lateral long short-term memory (BiLSTM) neural networks to estimate 3D GRFs during stair ascent and stair descent using the whole-body kinematics as the input. The dataset is collected from eighty subjects, including healthy and knee osteoarthritis individuals. We also developed a post-processing algorithm to remove artifacts on GRFs in the swing phase. Our models achieved excellent accuracy compared with the measured GRFs with the correlations of 0.908 & SIM; 0.991, the root mean squared error (RMSE) of 3.29% and 3.56% body weight (BW) and the normalized RMSE (nRMSE) lower than 5% and 8% for the complete GRFs during stair descent and ascent. Using our models, researchers can estimate 3D GRFs during stair walking without instrumented staircases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available