4.5 Article

DENSITY FUNCTION OF NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF SPLITTING AVF SCHEME FOR STOCHASTIC LANGEVIN EQUATION

Journal

MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION
Volume 91, Issue 337, Pages 2283-2333

Publisher

AMER MATHEMATICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1090/mcom/3752

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2020YFA0713701]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11971470, 12031020]
  4. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [P0039016]
  5. CAS AMSS-PolyU Joint Laboratory of Applied Mathematics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article studies the density function of the numerical solution of the splitting averaged vector field (AVF) scheme for the stochastic Langevin equation. The existence and smoothness of the density function of the numerical solution are proven, along with the optimal strong convergence rate in every Malliavin-Sobolev norm. It is also shown that the convergence order of the density function of the numerical scheme coincides with its strong convergence order.
In this article, we study the density function of the numerical solution of the splitting averaged vector field (AVF) scheme for the stochastic Langevin equation. We first show the existence of the density function of the numerical solution by proving its exponential integrability property, Malliavin differentiability and the almost surely non-degeneracy of the associated Malliavin covariance matrix. Then the smoothness of the density function is obtained through a lower bound estimate of the smallest eigenvalue of the corresponding Malliavin covariance matrix. Meanwhile, we derive the optimal strong convergence rate in every Malliavin-Sobolev norm of the numerical solution via Malliavin calculus. Combining the strong convergence result and the smoothness of the density functions, we prove that the convergence order of the density function of the numerical scheme coincides with its strong convergence order.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available