4.0 Article

Virtual Orthogonal Optimization in Upsetting of Cone End Billet with Large Height-To-Diameter Ratio

Journal

MATERIALS SCIENCE-MEDZIAGOTYRA
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 21-26

Publisher

KAUNAS UNIV TECH
DOI: 10.5755/j02.ms.29815

Keywords

upsetting; cone end billet; bulging; virtual orthogonal optimize; finite element method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel upsetting method named cone end billet upsetting (CEBU) is proposed to restrain bulging in the upsetting of the larger height-diameter ratio (LHDR) billet. The forming characters of a cylinder LHDR billet were analyzed using the commercial finite element software DEFORM. Virtual orthogonal tests were conducted to uncover the influence factors such as billet end taper, pressing speed, and billet height. The results show that CEBU effectively restrains bulging and is a promising method to control bulging in the upsetting of LHDR billet.
To restrain bulging in the upsetting of the larger height-diameter ratio (LHDR) billet, a novel upsetting method named cone end billet upsetting (CEBU) is proposed in this article. This method is featured by prefabricating cone shape at billet ends, and aimed to obtain a smaller rigid deformation zone in forming. The forming characters of a cylinder LHDR billet were analyzed by the commercial finite element software DEFORM. Moreover, virtual orthogonal tests were proceeded to uncover several influence factors such as billet end taper, pressing speed and billet height. The results show that bulging can be effectively restrained in CEBU. In the condition of billet end taper alpha = 15 degrees, pressing speed upsilon = 0.5 mm/s, and billet height h = 35 mm, a much smaller bulging can be achieved. The simulated results are in good agreement with experiment which was conducted with polycarbonate samples, and indicate CEBU is a promising method to control bulging in the upsetting of LHDR billet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available