Journal
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-022-01955-3
Keywords
Microbial carbonate precipitation; Concrete recycling; Recycled aggregate; Microstructural analysis; Construction and demolition waste; Compressive strength
Categories
Funding
- Australian Research Council [LP180100132]
- Curtin-IIT Kharagpur Collaborative PhD programme
- Australian Research Council [LP180100132] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Reutilising construction and demolition waste as aggregate in concrete is sustainable and prevents depletion of natural resources. Bio-treatment of recycled coarse aggregate has been shown to improve the drawbacks caused by attached mortar, and is more cost-effective than conventional cement slurry treatment.
Reutilisation of the construction and demolition (C&D) wastes as aggregate in concrete is a vital step towards sustainability as it prevents depletion of natural resources as well as alleviates wastes. However, the attached mortar on the aggregate surface renders certain shortcomings like excessive water absorption, high porosity, and weak interfaces. Recycled aggregates can be treated to improve these shortcomings. However, the minimisation of the drawbacks involves huge energy, materials, and cost. Moreover, the efficacy of such adopted method is sometime questionable, and which needs further research. This study demonstrates bio-treatment of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) as a means of upcycling and compares it with conventional cement slurry treatment. A novel spraying technique has been applied that significantly economises biocement treatment. The experimental results show that biocement treatment reduced the water absorption by 70%. The treatment has filled the pores of RCA and has prevented water absorption. In contrast, cement slurry coating treatment shows increase in water absorption of RCA by 19%. The compressive strength of concrete with 100% biocement treated RCA surpasses that of concrete with natural coarse aggregates. The genesis of this dramatic improvement in case of biocement has been established through micro-scale studies including scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The cost analysis demonstrates that RCA upcycled with biocement treatment is more economical than natural aggregates or cement treated ones. Findings of the present study led to the conclusion that 100% replacement of natural coarse aggregates can be achieved by upcycling C&D wastes as coarse aggregate through bio-treatment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available