4.1 Article

Resolving the phylogenetic relationship between Parmotrema crinitum and Parmotrema perlatum populations

Journal

LICHENOLOGIST
Volume 54, Issue 3-4, Pages 183-194

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282922000147

Keywords

genetic diversity; ITS; lichen; phylogenetic analyses; species delimitation

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2019-105312GB-I00]
  2. Santander-Universidad Complutense de Madrid [PR87/19-22637, G/6400100/3000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the phylogenetic relationship and species boundaries of Parmotrema crinitum and Parmotrema perlatum. The results indicate that they belong to the same lineage, but their specific phylogenetic relationships remain unresolved.
The widespread species Parmotrema crinitum (Ach.) M. Choisy and Parmotrema perlatum (Huds.) M. Choisy are mainly distinguished by their reproductive strategies. While P. crinitum propagates by isidia, P. perlatum produces soredia. In this study, we aim to evaluate the phylogenetic relationship between both species and to critically examine their species boundaries. To this purpose, 46 samples belonging to P. crinitum and P. perlatum were used in our analysis, including 22 for which we studied the morphology and chemistry, before extracting their DNA. We used 35 sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) of Parmotrema perlatum from Europe and Africa (20 of which were newly generated), and 11 of Parmotrema crinitum from Europe, North America and North Africa (two newly generated). Additionally, 28 sequences of several species from Parmotrema were included in the ITS dataset. The ITS data matrix was analyzed using different approaches, such as traditional phylogeny (maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses), genetic distances, automatic barcode gap discovery (ABGD) and the coalescent-based method poisson tree processes (PTP), in order to test congruence among results. Our results indicate that all samples referred to P. crinitum and P. perlatum nested in a well-supported monophyletic clade, but phylogenetic relationships among them remain unresolved. Delimitations inferred from PTP, ABGD and genetic distance analyses were comparable and suggested that P. crinitum and P. perlatum belong to the same lineage. Interestingly, two samples of P. perlatum separate in a different monophyletic clade, which is supported as a different lineage by all the analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available