4.7 Article

Alternatively spliced CSF3R isoforms in SRSF2 P95H mutated myeloid neoplasms

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 2499-2508

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01672-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOD Bone Marrow Failure Grant [W81XWH-15-1-0153]
  2. NIH [R01-HL128173]
  3. VeloSano Award
  4. National Science Centre (Poland) [2018/29/B/ST7/02550]
  5. Torsten Haferlach Leukamiediagnostik Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discovers two different isoforms of CSF3R in myelodysplastic syndromes and identifies the role of the splicing factor SRSF2 in regulating their expression, which affects granulopoiesis.
Alternatively spliced colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) isoforms Class III and Class IV are observed in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but their roles in disease remain unclear. We report that the MDS-associated splicing factor SRSF2 affects the expression of Class III and Class IV isoforms and perturbs granulopoiesis. Add-back of the Class IV isoform in Csf3r-null mouse progenitor cells increased granulocyte progenitors with impaired neutrophil differentiation, while add-back of the Class III produced dysmorphic neutrophils in fewer numbers. These CSF3R isoforms were elevated in patients with myeloid neoplasms harboring SRSF2 mutations. Using in vitro splicing assays, we confirmed increased Class III and Class IV transcripts when SRSF2 P95 mutations were co-expressed with the CSF3R minigene in K562 cells. Since SRSF2 regulates splicing partly by recognizing exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) sequences on pre-mRNA, deletion of either ESE motifs within CSF3R exon 17 decreased Class IV transcript levels without affecting Class III. CD34+ cells expressing SRSF2 P95H showed impaired neutrophil differentiation in response to G-CSF and was accompanied by increased levels of Class IV. Our findings suggest that SRSF2 P95H promotes Class IV splicing by binding to key ESE sequences in CSF3R exon 17, and that SRSF2, when mutated, contributes to dysgranulopoiesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available