4.5 Article

Joint gap produced by manual stress is dependent on the surgeon's experience and is smaller in flexion in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07107-y

Keywords

Robotic-assisted surgery; Reliability; Gap balance; Manual stress; Total knee arthroplasty; Gap tensioner

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reproducibility of gap measurements and the consistency of the gap distraction force produced by manual stress were investigated in this study. The results showed that the joint gap produced by manual stress is not reproducible depending on the surgeon's experience, and the distraction force applied by manual stress throughout the range of motion is not constant.
Purpose This study aimed to retrospectively investigate (1) the reproducibility of gap measurements by manual stress using the Z-shaped retractor depending on the surgeon's experience with this maneuver and (2) the consistency of the gap distraction force produced by manual stress throughout the range of motion (ROM) in the robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that the joint gap produced by manual stress is not reproducible depending on the surgeon's experience, and the distraction force applied by manual stress throughout the ROM is not constant. Methods Medial and lateral joint gaps were obtained throughout the ROM by manual stress or a tensioner by two surgeons with different levels of experience in robotic-assisted TKA. The association between the differences in gap measurement by the two surgeons and the preoperative radiographic parameters, including the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and absolute and relative varus/valgus laxities were analyzed. Results The experienced surgeon produced significantly greater gaps than the inexperienced surgeon from 0 degrees to 100 degrees flexion, with a mean difference of 0.35 +/- 0.12 mm in the medial gap (p < 0.0001), and from 10 degrees to 120 degrees flexion with a mean difference of 0.57 +/- 0.13 mm in the lateral gap (p < 0.0001). The tensioner produced a significantly greater medial gap from 70 degrees to 110 degrees flexion with a mean difference of 0.32 +/- 0.01 mm in the medial gap (p < 0.0001) and from 0 degrees to 110 degrees flexion with a mean difference of 1.12 +/- 0.26 mm in the lateral gap (p < 0.0001). The differences in gap distance by manual stress between experienced and inexperienced surgeons were moderately correlated with the HKA angle in the lateral gap (r = 0.40, p = 0.01). The gap differences due to manual stress and a tensioner showed moderate negative correlation with the HKA angle in the medial gap (r = - 0.50, p = 0.001) and weak negative correlation with the absolute valgus laxity in the lateral gap (r = - 0.35, p = 0.03). Conclusions The joint distraction force by manual stress may differ depending on the surgeon's experience and tended to be smaller in deep flexion; therefore, the flexion gap may be underestimated. Surgeons should determine implant positioning considering gap balance by manual stress, taking into account these characteristics of the manual stress maneuver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available