4.6 Article

Host Range Expansion of Shigella Phage Sf6 Evolves through Point Mutations in the Tailspike

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00929-22

Keywords

bacteriophage evolution; bacteriophages; experimental evolution; protein structure-function; structural biology; virus-host interactions

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [U24GM116789-03]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM110185, GM140803]
  3. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [1750125]
  4. University of Florida
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1750125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first critical step in a virus's infection cycle is attachment to its host. This study focused on the interaction between bacteriophage Sf6 and its host Shigella flexneri. The phage utilizes a two-step process to recognize and bind to its host, first recognizing the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of the host and then binding to outer membrane proteins. Through experimental evolution, mutations were observed in the receptor-binding tailspike protein that dramatically affected the binding of the receptors, providing flexibility for the phage in identifying host cells and altering its host range.
The first critical step in a virus's infection cycle is attachment to its host. This interaction is precise enough to ensure the virus will be able to productively infect the cell, but some flexibility can be beneficial to enable coevolution and host range switching or expansion. Bacteriophage Sf6 utilizes a two-step process to recognize and attach to its host Shigella flexneri. Sf6 first recognizes the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of S. flexneri and then binds outer membrane protein (Omp) A or OmpC. This phage infects serotype Y strains but can also form small, turbid plaques on serotype 2a(2); turbid plaques appear translucent rather than transparent, indicating greater survival of bacteria. Reduced plating efficiency further suggested inefficient infection. To examine the interactions between Sf6 and this alternate host, phages were experimentally evolved using mixed populations of S. flexneri serotypes Y and 2a(2). The recovered mutants could infect serotype 2a(2) with greater efficiency than the ancestral Sf6, forming clear plaques on both serotypes. All mutations mapped to two distinct regions of the receptor-binding tailspike protein: (i) adjacent to the LPS binding site near the N terminus; and (ii) at the distal, C-terminal tip of the protein. Although we anticipated interactions between the Sf6 tailspike and 2a(2) O-antigen to be weak, LPS of this serotype appears to inhibit infection through strong binding of particles, effectively removing them from the environment. The mutations of the evolved strains reduce the inhibitory effect by either reducing electrostatic interactions with the O-antigen or increasing reliance on the Omp secondary receptors. IMPORTANCE Viruses depend on host cells to propagate themselves. In mixed populations and communities of host cells, finding these susceptible host cells may have to be balanced with avoiding nonhost cells. Alternatively, being able to infect new cell types can increase the fitness of the virus. Many bacterial viruses use a two-step process to identify their hosts, binding first to an LPS receptor and then to a host protein. For Shigella virus Sf6, the tailspike protein was previously known to bind the LPS receptor. Genetic data from this work imply the tailspike also binds to the protein receptor. By experimentally evolving Sf6, we also show that point mutations in this protein can dramatically affect the binding of one or both receptors. This may provide Sf6 flexibility in identifying host cells and the ability to rapidly alter its host range under selective pressure. Viruses depend on host cells to propagate themselves. In mixed populations and communities of host cells, finding these susceptible host cells may have to be balanced with avoiding nonhost cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available