Journal
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 665-674Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jum.16063
Keywords
adhesive capsulitis; frozen shoulder; hydrodilatation; manipulation; physiotherapy; treatment; ultrasound-guided
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the additive value of immediate post-procedural manipulation versus physiotherapy following ultrasound-guided hydrodistention of the glenohumeral joint in patients with adhesive capsulitis. The results showed that immediate post-procedural manipulation was superior to physiotherapy in terms of improving shoulder functionality during a 6-month follow-up period. Post-interventional manipulations, the stage of adhesive capsulitis, and lower DASH and VAS scores at presentation were predictive of improved outcome.
Objectives To compare the additive value of immediate post-procedural manipulation versus physiotherapy, following ultrasound (US)-guided hydrodistention of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) and define predictors of outcome. Methods Within a 19-month period, 161 consecutive patients with AC were prospectively enrolled and allocated to two groups according to treatment, based on patients' individual preferences: 1) group-I, US-guided hydrodistension plus immediate post-procedural manipulations and 2) group-II, US-guided hydrodistension plus supervised physiotherapy program. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used for clinical assessment at baseline (immediately after treatment), 1, 3, and 6 months. Comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney U test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of outcome. P value <.05 defined significance. Results GHJ hydrodistension with manipulation or physiotherapy was linked to clinical improvement at all follow-up time-points. DASH scores of group-I remained constantly lower than DASH scores of group-II at all time-points (P < .001). VAS scores were lower in group-I than group-II at 1 and 3 months (P < .001 and P = .0019, respectively). Both groups had improved to a similar degree with respect to pain at 6 months (P = .29). The performance of post-interventional manipulations was predictive of improved shoulder functionality (as assessed with DASH scores) at all time-points, while low-grade disease and milder symptoms at presentation were associated with improved short-term pain. Conclusions Immediate post-procedural manipulations appeared to be superior to physiotherapy following GHJ hydrodistension for AC in terms of shoulder functionality during a 6-month follow-up period. Post-interventional manipulations, the stage of AC and lower DASH and VAS scores at presentations were predictive of improved outcome.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available