Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Lupus anticoagulant testing using two parallel methods detects additional cases and predicts persistent positivity
Daimon P. Simmons et al.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE (2018)
Identification of high thrombotic risk triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients is dependent on anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2glycoprotein I antibody detection assays
W. Chayoua et al.
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2018)
The lupus anticoagulant: results from 2257 patients attending a high-risk pregnancy clinic
Christine A. Clark et al.
BLOOD (2013)
Clinical significance of the mixing test in laboratory diagnoses of lupus anticoagulant: the fate of the mixing test in integrated lupus anticoagulant test systems
Sung Kuk Hong et al.
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS (2012)
Incidence of a first thromboembolic event in asymptomatic carriers of high-risk antiphospholipid antibody profile: a multicenter prospective study
Vittorio Pengo et al.
BLOOD (2011)
Lupus anticoagulant: performance of the tests as recommended by the latest ISTH guidelines
J. Swadzba et al.
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2011)
Clinical course of high-risk patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome
V. Pengo et al.
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2010)
Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection
V. Pengo et al.
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2009)
Antibody profile and clinical course in primary anti phospholipid syndrome with pregnancy morbidity
Amelia Ruffatti et al.
THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2006)
International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)
S Miyakis et al.
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2006)
Share Paper
