4.4 Article

Characterization and High-Temperature Fretting Wear Resistance of HVOF-Sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr, CoCrWC and CoCrWNiC Hardfacing Coatings

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 2157-2171

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-022-01431-y

Keywords

characterization; fretting wear; hardfacing coatings; HVOF; thermal spray

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, three different coatings were deposited on Hastelloy X substrates using the high-velocity oxy-fuel process. The coatings were characterized in terms of microstructure, phase composition, tensile bond strength, elastic modulus, Vickers microhardness, and fretting wear resistance. The results showed variations in the performance of the coatings, and the wear mechanisms were also discussed.
In the present study, Cr3C2-25wt%NiCr, CoCrWC (Stellite-6) and CoCrWC (FSX 414) coatings were deposited by the high-velocity oxy-fuel process on Hastelloy X substrates. The microstructure of the coatings was characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction was employed to identify the phase composition of the coatings. Tensile bond strength, elastic modulus and Vickers microhardness of the coatings were measured. A self-mated fretting wear test was also carried out on the coatings at room temperature and 550 degrees C. The results showed that some carbide dissolution occurred during the formation of Cr3C2-NiCr coating, although the coating displayed the highest bonding strength, Vickers microhardness and elastic modulus. The Stellite-6 coating showed a significant amount of unmelted particles and the most surface roughness. Oxide stringers were the main microstructural defect of the FSX 414 coating. The Stellite-6 and Cr3C2-NiCr coating had the best fretting wear resistance at the temperature of 25 and 550 degrees C, respectively. The wear mechanisms of the hardfacing coatings were discussed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available