4.7 Article

Thermal behavior of gamma-irradiated urea-formaldehyde composites based on the differently activated montmorillonite K10

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 147, Issue 22, Pages 12467-12479

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-022-11450-0

Keywords

gamma-Irradiation; Montmorillonite; UF resin; Thermal stability

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-68/2022-14/200123, 451-03-68/2022-14/ 200017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the thermal characteristics of composite materials formulated with UF resin and differently activated K10. The samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, and infrared spectroscopy. The results showed that the modified UF/AK10 composite exhibited higher thermal stability compared to the other two composites.
This work investigated the thermal characteristics of irradiated composite materials formulated on the urea-formaldehyde resin (UF) and differently activated montmorillonite (K10). UF resin with molar ratio F:U = 0.8 was synthesized in situ with differently activated K10. K10 was activated by heating at 400 degrees C, with sulfuric acid (H2SO4) without and with magnetic stirring. The samples are marked with TK10, AK10, ASK10, UF/TK10, UF/AK10, and UF/ASK10, respectively. The samples were identified by applying X-ray diffraction analysis and thermal methods (TGA and DTA), supported by data from Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The degree of activation was determined by measuring specific surface area (SSA) using Sear's method. Measurement of the value for SSA shows that the sample TK10 has the highest value (317 m(2)g(-1)) among the other two samples, (for AKIO = 183 m(2)g(-1) and ASK10 = 167 m(2)g(-1)). The modified UF/AK10 composite is more thermally stable than other two modified UF/K10 composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available