4.5 Article

Individual rationality and overall fairness in fixed cost allocation: An approach under DEA cross-efficiency evaluation mechanism

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 992-1007

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2079434

Keywords

Fixed cost allocation; individual rationality; overall fairness; data envelopment analysis; Pareto optimality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new fixed cost allocation approach that takes into account individual rationality and fairness. By using the data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation, the authors develop two principles for individual rationality and two principles for overall fairness, and build a multi-objective model to solve the problem. The suggested approach outperforms some previous methods in numerical examples and a real-case study.
This paper develops a new fixed cost allocation (FCA) approach that considers individual rationality and fairness using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency evaluation. We propose two FCA principles from individual rationality: a novel self-lowest principle and the efficient after FCA principle. Under the precondition that the individual rationality principles are satisfied, we suggest determining the final FCA result based on two overall fairness principles: the lower bound principle and the cross-efficiency Pareto-optimality principle. A multi-objective FCA model is built following these principles. An algorithm and some rules are used to solve the multi-objective model and obtain the final cross-efficiency evaluation and FCA result. Our study contributes by explicitly showing the design of individual rationality and overall fairness in FCA using the DEA cross-efficiency evaluation mechanism. Finally, we compare the suggested approach with some previous ones using a numerical example and illustrate its usefulness through a truck fleet case study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available