4.5 Article

Spatial acuity of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) biosonar system with a bat and human comparison

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 151, Issue 6, Pages 3847-3857

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0011676

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The horizontal angular resolution of two bottlenose dolphins was measured using a target discrimination paradigm. The results suggest that horizontal auditory spatial acuity may be a common feature of the mammalian auditory system.
Horizontal angular resolution was measured in two bottlenose dolphins using a two-alternative forced-choice, biosonar target discrimination paradigm. The task required a stationary dolphin positioned in a hoop to discriminate two physical targets at a range of 4m. The angle separating the targets was manipulated to estimate an angular discrimination threshold of 1.5 degrees. In a second experiment, a similar two-target biosonar discrimination task was conducted with one free-swimming dolphin, to test whether its emission beam was a critical factor in discriminating the targets. The spatial separation between two targets was manipulated to measure a discrimination threshold of 6.7 cm. There was a relationship between differences in acoustic signals received at each target and the dolphin's performance. The results of the angular resolution experiment were in good agreement with measures of the minimum audible angle of both dolphins and humans and remarkably similar to measures of angular difference discrimination in echolocating dolphins, bats, and humans. The results suggest that horizontal auditory spatial acuity may be a common feature of the mammalian auditory system rather than a specialized feature exclusive to echolocating auditory predators. (C) 2022 Acoustical Society of America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available