4.6 Article

Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's Next

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z

Keywords

Physics-Informed Neural Networks; Scientific Machine Learning; Deep Neural Networks; Nonlinear equations; Numerical methods; Partial Differential Equations; Uncertainty

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are a type of neural network that incorporates model equations, such as partial differential equations, as a component. PINNs have been used to solve various types of equations, including fractional equations and stochastic partial differential equations. Current research focuses on optimizing PINN through different aspects, such as activation functions, gradient optimization techniques, neural network structures, and loss function structures. Despite the demonstrated feasibility of PINN in certain cases compared to traditional numerical techniques, there are still unresolved theoretical issues.
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks (NNs) that encode model equations, like Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a component of the neural network itself. PINNs are nowadays used to solve PDEs, fractional equations, integral-differential equations, and stochastic PDEs. This novel methodology has arisen as a multi-task learning framework in which a NN must fit observed data while reducing a PDE residual. This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on PINNs: while the primary goal of the study was to characterize these networks and their related advantages and disadvantages. The review also attempts to incorporate publications on a broader range of collocation-based physics informed neural networks, which stars form the vanilla PINN, as well as many other variants, such as physics-constrained neural networks (PCNN), variational hp-VPINN, and conservative PINN (CPINN). The study indicates that most research has focused on customizing the PINN through different activation functions, gradient optimization techniques, neural network structures, and loss function structures. Despite the wide range of applications for which PINNs have been used, by demonstrating their ability to be more feasible in some contexts than classical numerical techniques like Finite Element Method (FEM), advancements are still possible, most notably theoretical issues that remain unresolved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available