4.5 Article

Focused ion beam preparation of halide perovskite microscopy specimens: evaluation of the beam induced damage

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 34, Issue 41, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac8404

Keywords

beam damage; FIB milling; halide perovskite; TEM sample preparation

Funding

  1. Shanghai Science and technology Plan [21DZ 2260400]
  2. ShanghaiTech University
  3. Center for high-resolution Electron Microscopy (ChEM) at ShanghaiTech University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence factors of ion beam damage on ion beam-sensitive materials and successfully obtains high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images. Theoretical investigations reveal a rapid temperature rise during ion beam milling, while experimental investigations suggest that choosing appropriate FIB parameters and reducing milling time can alleviate structure damage.
Focused ion beam (FIB) is currently one of the most commonly used methods for preparing transmission electron microscopy bulk specimens. However, for ion beam-sensitive materials such as halide perovskites, the ion beam milling process can easily cause decomposition and structure damage to the specimen. Here we investigate the influence factors of ion beam damage theoretically and experimentally, and successfully obtain the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy image of inorganic halide perovskite sample prepared by FIB. Theoretical investigations indicate that the temperature rises extremely fast for ion beam milling, reaching more than 80% of the highest temperature in less than one picosecond. Experimental investigations of halide perovskites in various forms (nanostructures, thin film devices, and single crystals) suggest choosing appropriate FIB acceleration voltage and beam current together with strategies to reduce the milling time may alleviate structure damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available