4.6 Article

Controlled CVD Growth of Highly ⟨111⟩-Oriented 3C-SiC

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 126, Issue 23, Pages 9918-9925

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c01171

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SGL CARBON GmbH
  2. Swedish Research Council (VR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly <111>-oriented 3C-SiC coatings with hexagonally shaped pyramidal crystals were prepared using chemical vapor deposition, with silicon tetrachloride and toluene as the carbon precursors. The growth orientation was explained by the adsorption energy on different crystal planes.
Highly < 111 >-oriented 3C-SiC coatings with a distinct surface morphology consisting of hexagonally shaped pyramidal crystals were prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) using silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4) and toluene (C7H8) at T <= 1250 degrees C and p(tot) = 10 kPa. In contrast, similar deposition conditions, with methane (CH4) as the carbon precursor, resulted in randomly oriented 3C-SiC coatings with a cauliflower-like surface of SiC crystallites. No excess carbon was detected in the highly < 111 >-oriented 3C-SiC samples despite the use of aromatic hydrocarbons. The difference in the preferred growth orientation of the 3C-SiC coatings deposited by using C7H8 and CH4 as the carbon precursors was explained via quantum chemical calculations of binding energies on various crystal planes. The adsorption energy of C6H6 on the SiC (111) plane was 6 times higher than that on the (110) plane. On the other hand, CH3 exhibited equally strong adsorption on both planes. This suggested that the highly < 111 >-oriented 3C-SiC growth with C7H8 as the carbon precursor, where both C6H6 and CH3 were considered the main active carbon-containing film forming species, was due to the highly preferred adsorption on the (111) plane, while the lower surface energy of the (110) plane controlled the growth orientation in the CH4 process, in which only CH3 contributed to the film deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available