4.6 Review

Strengthening Research that Answers Nutrition Questions of Public Health Importance: Leveraging the Experience of the USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 152, Issue 8, Pages 1823-1830

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxac140

Keywords

NESR; nutrition research; systematic review; public health research; dietary guidance

Funding

  1. Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, USDA, Alexandria, VA, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team has conducted systematic reviews on nutrition and public health topics for over a decade. They have provided recommendations for the research community, including using strong study designs, recruiting diverse study participants, using valid and reliable assessment methods, and reporting all relevant information. Implementation of these recommendations can strengthen nutrition and public health evidence.
The Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team conducts nutrition- and public health-related systematic reviews and is within the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. NESR has collaborated with scientific experts to conduct systematic reviews on nutrition and public health topics for more than a decade and is uniquely positioned to share recommendations with the research community to strengthen research quality and impact, especially the evidence base that supports public health nutrition guidance, including future editions of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Leveraging the expertise of NESR and its systematic review process resulted in the following recommendations for the research community: a) use the strongest study design feasible with sufficient sample size(s); b) enroll study participants who reflect the diversity of the population of interest and report participant characteristics; c) use valid and reliable dietary assessment methods; d) describe the interventions or exposures of interest and use standard definitions to promote consistency; e) use valid and reliable health outcome measures; f) account for variables that may impact the relationship between nutrition-related interventions or exposures and health outcomes; g) carry out studies for a sufficient duration and include repeated measures, as appropriate; and h) report all relevant information to inform accurate interpretation and evaluation of study results. Implementing these recommendations can strengthen nutrition and public health evidence and increase its utility in future public health nutrition systematic reviews. However, implementation will require additional support from the entire research community, including scientific journals and funding agencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available