4.7 Article

The reproducibility of corrosion testing in supercritical water-Results of a second international interlaboratory comparison exercise

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 565, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153759

Keywords

Nickel; Stainless steel; Mass loss; SEM; High temperature corrosion

Funding

  1. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Federal Nuclear Science and Technology Program
  2. . Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFE0116200]
  3. NSERC/NRCan/AECL Generation IV Energy Technologies Program Academy of Finland, project IDEA grant [260493]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [260493, 260493] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reduced systemic differences between laboratories by unilateral preparation of coupons and unilateral chemical cleaning. The results showed significant mass loss of candidate materials for supercritical water-cooled reactors under experimental conditions, possibly due to factors such as mass transfer, galvanic and local corrosion.
Supercritical water-cooled reactor candidate materials are typically corrosion-resistant alloys whose mass changes in supercritical water fluctuate around zero. A previous interlaboratory corrosion experiment exercise revealed large scatter in mass change results between laboratories. Here, we reduced systemic differences between laboratories by unilateral preparation of coupons and unilateral chemical cleaning. Type 310S stainless steel and Alloy 800HT test coupons were exposed for 10 0 0 h to 550 degrees C, 25 MPa, deaerated water. Average mass loss for 310S and 800HT was 38 +/- 26 and 51 +/- 31 mg/dm(2), respectively. Differences in mass transfer, galvanic and local corrosion, and average coupon temperature may explain the poor reproducibility. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available