4.5 Article

Effects of cisplatin chemotherapy on the osseointegration of titanium implants

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 337-346

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.012

Keywords

Dental implants; Chemotherapy; Cisplatin; Osseointegration; Micro-computed tomography; Histomorphometry

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia [2014096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The effect of chemotherapy on the osseointegration of dental implants has received less interest compared with radiotherapy. Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of cisplatin chemotherapy on the osseointegration of dental implants in a rabbit model. Materials and methods: Sixteen New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to two groups of treatment of either cisplatin at 2.5 mg/kg/week for 4 weeks (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8), in which the first dose was administered 2 days prior to the surgical procedure. Each rabbit received one titanium dental implant inserted in the right distal femoral condyle. Four rabbits from each group were sacrificed 4 and 8 weeks after implant insertion. Osseointegration of the dental implants was analysed using micro computed tomography and histomorphometric evaluation. Results: Analysis of micro-computed tomography data and histomorphometric data showed that the osseointegration parameters, including the ratio of bone volume to total volume (BV/TV) and bone implant contact (BIC%) for the cisplatin group, were significantly lower compared to the control group at 4 and 8 weeks. (P <= 0.05). Conclusion: Cisplatin chemotherapy had a negative effect on the osseointegration of dental implants when inserted throughout the chemotherapeutic regimens in a rabbit model. (C) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available