The legacy of Gerald L. Gottlieb in human movement neuroscience

In this paper, we review the legacy of Gerald (Gerry) Gottlieb in various fields related to the neural control of human movement. His studies on the myotatic (stretch) reflex and postmyotatic responses to ankle joint perturbations paved the way for current explorations of long-loop reflexes and their role in the control of movement. The dual-strategy hypothesis introduced order into a large body of literature on the triphasic muscle activation patterns seen over a variety of voluntary movements in healthy persons. The dual-strategy hypothesis continues to be important for understanding the performance of subjects with disordered motor control. The principle of linear synergy (covariance of joint torques) was an attempt to solve one of the notorious problems of motor redundancy, which remains an important topic in the field. Gerry's attitude toward the equilibrium-point hypothesis varied between rejection and using it to explore patterns of hypothetical control variables and movement variability. The discovery of reciprocal excitation in healthy neonates fostered other studies of changes in spinal cord physiology as motor skills develop. In addition, studies of people with spasticity and the effects of treatment with intrathecal baclofen were crucial in demonstrating the possibility of unmasking voluntary movements after suppression of the hyperreflexia of spasticity. Gerry Gottlieb contributed a significant body of knowledge that formed a solid foundation from which to study a variety of neurological diseases and their treatments, and a more comprehensive and parsimonious foundation to describe the neural control of human movement.

Automated summary

This paper reviews Gerry Gottlieb's contributions to the neural control of human movement, including studies on muscle reflexes, the dual-strategy hypothesis, and the principle of linear synergy. His research has provided a solid foundation for studying neurological diseases and their treatments, as well as a more comprehensive and parsimonious understanding of the neural control of human movement.