4.5 Article

The role of myofibroblasts in the development of osteoradionecrosis in a newly established rabbit model

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 725-733

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.002

Keywords

Animal model; Human equivalent radiation; Myofibroblasts; Osteoradionecrosis of jaws; Radiation-induced fibrosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81202150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to establish a proper animal model of osteoradionecrosis of jaws (ORNJ) and to observe preliminarily the characteristics of myofibroblasts, the key effector cell of fibrosis, in ORNJ. Rabbit mandibles were irradiated at three different doses based on a human equivalent radiation schedule, and examined by gross manifestation, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPELT), micro-computed tomography, sequential fluorochrome labeling, and histology. Immunohistochemistry staining of alpha-SMA was applied to detect the existence of myofibroblasts. The exposed necrotic bone, which is the main indication of ORNJ, started to be observed at all rabbits at 9 Gy. With the radiation dose increasing, the microarchitecture of the irradiated mandibles was more destroyed, the metabolism and mineralization of the irradiated mandibles diminished, the osteocytes number decreased, and more mature bones were substituted by fibrosis in the irradiated mandibles. In addition, as the radiation dose increased, the myofibroblast number increased and collected around the separated sequestrum, which indicated that myofibroblasts might relate to the pathogenesis of ORNJ. In summary, a clinically translational ORNJ model was successfully established in our study, and the role of myofibroblasts in the pathogenesis of ORNJ is described for the first time. (c) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available